solutions · enterprise (500+)
The board wants efficiency; legal wants guarantees; candidates want a fair process. Klyria is built so these three things don't compete with each other.
8
regulations covered out of the box
100%
AI decisions with audit trail
0
bias: verifiable blind evaluation
3
permission roles: admin, recruiter, manager
Adopting AI without explainability is a regulatory risk no DPO wants to own.
Diversity policies exist, but the process can't prove it evaluates without looking at a name.
Flat permissions, no audit trail, data retention impossible to configure by country.
01
Candidate transparency, human in the loop, right to review, logs of every AI decision. Plus UK GDPR, CCPA, LGPD and 5 more regulations.
02
Anonymous mode per job: no name, gender or photo until the interview stage. Verifiable, not a slogan.
03
Who did what, when and with what data — including every AI recommendation with its justification.
04
Admin, recruiter, hiring manager: each sees and touches exactly what they're supposed to.
05
Employee-only jobs, referral programme with configurable bonus and an external agency portal with fee control.
06
Configurable retention policies, automatic anonymization and a candidate rights portal.
«The question isn't whether you'll use AI in hiring. It's whether you'll be able to show how it decides.»
what the regulator will ask — and what your board already asks