industries · BPO & contact centers
BPO campaigns are won or lost on speed and volume. You need to evaluate thousands of profiles in many languages simultaneously — without an army of recruiters.
5000+
applications per campaign
30+
languages evaluated natively
70%
lower cost per hire
48h
to close a batch of positions
A process built for this sector — AI sets it up and you tweak it in one click.
Thousands of CVs sorted in parallel
Real proficiency per language, not self-reported
Customer scenario; tone and resolution evaluated
Clarity, active listening and objection handling
24/7 shifts and work mode filtered
Async and in the candidate's language
Thousands of applications per campaign: no human team evaluates them with consistent criteria.
Self-reported proficiency doesn't cut it; you need to actually measure language ability before hiring.
Every extra recruiter and every day of delay inflates the cost of a campaign that already runs on tight margins.
insight ia Tu pipeline generó 154 candidaturas pero solo 24 entrevistas (16%). Acelera la criba donde bajó a 40 candidatos, o ajusta los criterios para subir ese volumen.
Candidatos
1.284
+18%
Time-to-hire
11 d
−42%
Pass rate
23%
+5pt
Coste/hire
412€
−61%
embudo de conversión
contrataciones / mes
what we evaluate here
Fast screening isn't enough: you have to measure what defines a great agent. What we evaluate in BPO:
ideal profile fingerprint for this sector · no name, no photo
Real proficiency per language, AI-evaluated, not self-reported.
A customer scenario; tone, listening and resolution are scored.
Clarity, objection handling and empathy under pressure.
Shifts, holidays and work mode filtered from the start.
«At scale, the difference isn't screening faster. It's screening with the same criteria on application one thousand as on application one.»
why AI beats human teams at volume