industries · technology
Strong tech profiles have ten offers at once. You can't drag out the process or bore them with generic tests — but you also can't hire without seeing them actually build something.
10x
offers a great dev has at any one time
5
days saved vs. 5 interview rounds
100%
verified deliverables, zero templates
0
pedigree bias: code is what gets scored
A process built for this sector — AI sets it up and you tweak it in one click.
Real stack and experience, no inflation
JS, Python, SQL or React depending on the role
AI-designed, weighted criteria
Detects AI, copy-paste and tab switches
Async first round, STAR analysis
Your tech lead, with suggested follow-up questions
Inflated tech stacks, rounded-up years: the paper doesn't tell you if they can actually do the work.
Five rounds and two weeks of scheduling: by the time you decide, they've already accepted another offer.
Filtering by university or previous employer leaves great self-taught profiles out in the cold.
insight ia Tu pipeline generó 154 candidaturas pero solo 24 entrevistas (16%). Acelera la criba donde bajó a 40 candidatos, o ajusta los criterios para subir ese volumen.
Candidatos
1.284
+18%
Time-to-hire
11 d
−42%
Pass rate
23%
+5pt
Coste/hire
412€
−61%
embudo de conversión
contrataciones / mes
what we evaluate here
Every candidate goes through a real test and unique assessments. What we evaluate in tech:
ideal profile fingerprint for this sector · no name, no photo
Take-home or case study for the role, with weighted criteria.
JS, Python, SQL, React + reasoning, selected by AI.
AI-generated answers, copy-paste and tab switches detected.
The deliverable is scored without seeing a name or pedigree.
«The best signal from a developer isn't where they worked. It's what they build when you give them a problem.»
why the take-home beats the CV filter