comparison · klyria vs ats tradicional
The classic ATS was built to track: columns, statuses and reminders. All the evaluation work is still yours. That's exactly the part Klyria automates.
first things first: what ATS tradicional does well
Established ATS platforms are robust, familiar to teams and deeply integrated.
For organizations that only need order and traceability, they get the job done.
Their marketplace ecosystem covers almost any point need — at a cost per piece.
| ATS tradicional | Klyria | |
|---|---|---|
| Candidate tracking | Yes — it's their core | Yes, with visual pipeline and full timeline |
| CV reading | Field parsing | ✓Evaluation against requirements with evidence and score |
| First interviews | You do them, one by one | ✓AI avatar or voice, 24/7, with automatic STAR report |
| Tests | Paid integrations | ✓56 native tests included |
| Final interview | You, alone, with your notes | ✓Live copilot + automatic report when you hang up |
| Decision | Gut feeling + spreadsheet | ✓Full candidate dossier: scores, dimensions, references and justified recommendation |
| Real cost | License + assessment add-ons + your team's hours | ✓One platform, from 0€ |
"Traditional ATS" describes the generic applicant tracking category, not any specific product.
Buenos días, Marta.
domingo, 14 de junio de 2026
Ofertas activas
24
Candidatos en proceso
18
Finalistas pendientes
6
Entrevistas esta semana
3
mis ofertas activas
Store Manager — Flagship
Customer Success Manager
Enfermero/a — turno noche
actividad reciente
If all you need is an organized candidate database, any ATS will do. If you need to make better decisions in less time, you need an evaluation engine — not a filing cabinet.